ascertained the age of the petitioner on the day of alleged occurrence only 10 years and 4 months approximately. The rejection order either of the Board or of the learned Sessions Judge do not disclose that the petitioner is in association of any known criminals or any adverse remark given in social investigation report for denying the privilege of bail to the juvenile in conflict with law. It goes without saying that the gravity of the offence is no consideration for rejection of the bail to a juvenile and only on that ground the bail was refused, so the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Madhepura in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No.44 of 2015, giving rise to J.J.B. No.19 of 2017 (G.R. No.343 of 2015) with condition that the mother of the petitioner will be will be one of the bailors who will file an undertaking to keep her son in proper care and supervision.