Allowed

Pappu Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Sept 2017CR. MISC./40377/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to Pappu Yadav and Rekha Devi in a kidnapping case under Section 366A IPC. The bail was allowed because the victim's deposition did not implicate them, as the accused listed in the FIR were different individuals, their parents. Standard bail conditions were imposed.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed. Petitioners to surrender within six weeks and furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties.

Pappu Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40377 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -465 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAGARIA District- KHAGARIA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Pappu Yadav, Son of Late Ramsewak Yadav, 2. Rekha Devi, Wife of Pappu Yadav, Both are resident of Village- Murli, Police Station- Beldaur, District- Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar.

¶6

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶7

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nandsingh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

¶8

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 21-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶10

State.

¶11

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 465 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

It has been submitted that victim girl on her recovery has given statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. wherein she has not leveled any allegation of overt act against these petitioners. These petitioners are not even named in the written report. The victim girl in her statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. has stated that one Sonu had taken her to different places. These petitioners are parents of Sonu.

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40377 of 2017 (2) dt.21-09-2017

¶15

2/2

¶16

prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 465 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

¶17

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶18

S.Ali/-

¶19

U T

Pappu Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pappu Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ankur Sharma Vs The Union Of India Through Narcotics Department and Anr.

Mithlesh Kumar @ Mithalesh Yadav @ Teju Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Jai Hind Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Dr. Ambarish Kumar Chaturvedi Vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Patna

Dr. Tapaswi Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar, Through Director General, Vigilance, Patna

Wakil Mia and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar