Dismissed

Ankur Sharma v. The Union Of India Through Narcotics Department and Anr.

Patna HC20 Sept 2017CR. MISC./23689/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter involving charges under the NDPS Act for possession of Charas, the High Court of Judicature at Patna considered the bail application. The Court, noting receipt of the FSL report, held that the incident facts were clear and denied bail.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail is rejected. Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.

Ankur Sharma Vs The Union Of India Through Narcotics… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23689 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2017 Thana -RAXAUL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)

¶3

====================================================== 1. Ankur Sharma, son of Binod Sharma, H. No.- 180, resident of villagePanewati Colony, Part-2, Police Station- Kotwali, Tahsil- Ghaziabad, District- Ghaziabad.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶5

The Union of India through Narcotics Department.

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Tondon, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP For the Union of India : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, CGC

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶10

9/ 20-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

Petitioner seeks bail in NDPS Case No.14 of 2017 arising out of Raxaul P.S. Case No.24 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 20, 22, 23 & 24 of the NDPS Act pending in the Court of the Sessions Judge/Special Judge, East Chamapran, Motihari.

¶12

Report of the Forensic Science Laboratory has been

¶13

received.

¶14

It is alleged that 1.470 gr. Charas was recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Seizure list was prepared. Seizure list and confessional statement of the petitioner made before the police have been enclosed with the First Information

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23689 of 2017 (9) dt.20-09-2017

¶16

2/2

¶17

Report.

¶18

Report of the Forensic Science Laboratory was called for, which has been received. It is mentioned in the report of the Forensic Science Laboratory that the article recovered from the possession of the petitioner was found to be Charas .

¶19

In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage.

¶20

Accordingly, prayer for bail is rejected .

¶21

Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of the

¶22

petitioner.

¶23

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶24

JA/-

¶25

U T

Ankur Sharma v. The Union Of India Through Narcotics Department and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankur Sharma v. The Union Of India Through Narcotics Department and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rana Gaurav Singh @ Dhinua @ Dhananjay Vs The State Of Bihar

Sheth Yadav @ Ram Sheth Yadav @ Seth @ Ram Seth Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Kumar Sahu @ Ram Kumar Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Mithlesh Kumar @ Mithalesh Yadav @ Teju Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Jai Hind Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Safique Vs The State Of Bihar