Allowed

Dr. Tapaswi Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar, Through Director General, Vigilance, Patna

Patna HC21 Sept 2017CR. MISC./34426/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, a retired Registrar, in a vigilance case involving cheque fraud and criminal conspiracy, subject to standard conditions including cooperation and strict compliance with summons.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and complying with standard bail conditions.

Dr. Tapaswi Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar, Through Director… — Corruption | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34426 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -107 Year- 2016 Thana -C.B.I CASE District- MUZAFFARPUR

¶3

====================================================== Dr. Tapaswi Prasad Singh, Son of Late Ganga Prasad Singh, resident of village Krishnadaspur, P.S. Kahalgaon, Bodhchak, District- Bhagalpur at present R/o Mohalla Dahiyawa Tola, Sona Sadan Bypass Road, P.S. Mufassil, District- Chapra, the then Registrar, Retired from Department of Physics, J.P. University, Chapra.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar, through Director General, Vigilance, Patna.

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramakant Sharma (L.O.,Inc.,Vigilance) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶9

5 21-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶10

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Special Case No. 49 of 2016 arising out of Vigilance Case No. 107 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 477(A), 409, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the P.C. Act.

¶11

It has been submitted that petitioner was posted as Registrar of J.P. University, Chapra. He had joined on 6.12.2011 and was relieved from post of Registrar on 04.01.2013. The aid amount was to be disbursed among teaching and non-teaching employees of the college by Managing Committee of the college concerned. The Principal and the Managing Committee of the

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34426 of 2017 (5) dt.21-09-2017

¶13

2/3

¶14

college were responsible for disbursement of aid amount. The aid amount was sent to Daroga Rai Degree College, Siwan. The petitioner was admittedly Registrar of J.P. University, Chapra, and he has no role in disbursement of the aid amount among teaching and non-teaching employees of the college.

¶15

It has further been submitted that other co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by different coordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated 14.07.2017, 27.07.2017, 04.09.2017, 04.09.2017 and 01.07.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. case Nos. 25808 of 2017, 25927 of 2017, 37051 of 2017, 36694 of 2017 and 27296 of 2017 respectively.

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Special Case No. 49 of 2016 arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No. 107 of 2016, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Vigilance, North Bihar, Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34426 of 2017 (5) dt.21-09-2017

¶18

3/3

¶19

jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶20

The petitioner will cooperate in the investigation and he will appear before the Investigating Agency as and when required by him.

¶21

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶22

S.Ali/-

¶23

U T

Dr. Tapaswi Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar, Through Director General, Vigilance, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Tapaswi Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar, Through Director General, Vigilance, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ankur Sharma Vs The Union Of India Through Narcotics Department and Anr.

Mithlesh Kumar @ Mithalesh Yadav @ Teju Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Jai Hind Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Dr. Ambarish Kumar Chaturvedi Vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Patna

Wakil Mia and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Pappu Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar