Allowed

Lalan Bhuiya and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC7 Aug 2017CR. MISC./35370/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna allowed bail to the petitioner parents in a case under Sections 366A/31 IPC where they were named in the FIR but faced no direct allegations of kidnapping. Bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with sureties were required.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioners on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of the like amount, subject to conditions.

Lalan Bhuiya and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35370 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -317 Year- 2017 Thana -DEHRI TOWN District- SASARAM (ROHTAS)

¶3

====================================================== 1. Lalan Bhuiya Son of Late Tulsi Bhuiya. 2. Phula Devi @ Puranwashia Devi, wife of Lalan Bhuiya. Both are the Resident of Village- Mounia Bigha, P.O. & P.S.- Dalmia Nagar, DistrictRohtas.

¶4

.... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 07-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶6

This is an application for bail in connection with Dehri (Dalmia Nagar) P.S.Case No. 317 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

Petitioners are named in the FIR and the case is under

¶8

Section 366A IPC.

¶9

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that allegation is against the son of the petitioners, who was seen going along with the victim girl and when informant enquired about her daughter from the parents of the boy, hot altercation between the parties took place and except allegation of scuffling between the

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35370 of 2017 (2) dt.07-08-2017

¶11

2/3

¶12

parties there is nothing against them and they are in custody for more than two months having clean antecedent.

¶13

Heard learned APP also.

¶14

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that petitioners are father and mother of the boy and there is no allegation of kidnapping against them, let the petitioners, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/(Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dehri-on-Sone, Rohtas, in connection with Dehri (Dalmianagar) P.S.Case No. 317 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :-

¶15

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

¶16

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

(iii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35370 of 2017 (2) dt.07-08-2017

¶19

3/3

¶20

consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail.

¶21

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶22

spal/-

¶23

Lalan Bhuiya and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalan Bhuiya and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganesh Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Arbind Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Wasim @ Oshim Mian Vs The State Of Bihar

Laxmi Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Tulla Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Arvind Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through C. B. I.