Dismissed

Arbind Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Aug 2017CR. MISC./13881/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court rejected the application for bail filed by Arbind Yadav in a case involving grievous hurt, murder, and other offences. The court observed that the trial was at its concluding stage and declined to grant bail, instead directing the trial court to conclude proceedings within three months.

What did the court decide?

Bail refused; trial court directed to conclude trial within three months.

Arbind Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13881 of 2017 (3) dt.04-08-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13881 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -149 Year- 2016 Thana -NAUGACHIA District- BHAGALPUR

¶4

====================================================== 1. Arbind Yadav Son of Jyotish Yadav, R/o Village Sadhopur, P.S.-Rangra District-Bhagalpur

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K. Agarwal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ganesh Prasad Singh For the informant : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶7

3 04-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶8

This is an application for bail in connection with Naugachia P.S.Case No. 149 of 2016, corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 05 of 2017, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

¶9

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. Further the deceased himself was a veteran criminal and he might have been killed by one of his enemies. It has also been submitted that now the trial is at the concluding stage and petitioner has been in judicial custody since 12.11.2016.

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13881 of 2017 (3) dt.04-08-2017

¶11

Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the informant

¶12

also.

¶13

Considering the fact that now the trial is at concluding stage, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. However, learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of three months positively.

¶14

With the above observation, this application is disposed of.

¶15

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶16

sunil/-

¶17

U T

Arbind Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbind Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Kumar Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Kajal Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhushan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ganesh Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Wasim @ Oshim Mian Vs The State Of Bihar

Pramod Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar