The Patna High Court rejected the bail application of the petitioner in a drug offense case. The court refused bail due to the huge quantity of charas recovered and directed the trial court to expedite the trial.
Prayer for bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31697 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2017 Thana -SIKTA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH)
====================================================== Wasim @ Oshim Mian, S/o Sachan Mian, Resident of Village- Bhiswa, P.S.- Bhiswa, Dist- Parsa, State- Nepal.
.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
4 04-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Sikta P.S.Case No. 08 of 2017, Trial No. 8 of 2017, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8/20(b)(ii)B of NDPS Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 2
kg. of charas from the utensil kept near the petitioner.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner, rather recovery has been from the dental clinic in which the petitioner was under treatment and he is in custody for seven months.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and considering the fact that
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31697 of 2017 (4) dt.04-08-2017
2/2
huge quantity of charas has been recovered, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected.
However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the
trial.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
spal/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the quantity of charas recovered from his dental clinic.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Wasim @ Oshim Mian
The State of Bihar
Vinod Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
