Petitioners sought permission to withdraw an application pending before the High Court of Patna. The court, entertaining oral argument, accorded permission for withdrawal with liberty to raise defenses in the trial court.
Permission accorded to withdraw the application with liberty to raise defense in trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33245 of 2014 (3) dt.03-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33245 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2495 Year- 2013 Thana -WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- WESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH)
======================================================
Kailash Sah @ Kailash Prasad & Ors.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
State of Bihar & Anr
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sewak Choudhary (App)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER
3 03-08-2017 At the length of argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to raise their defence/points in trial court at the appropriate stage.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)
Bhardwaj/-
U
Kailash Sah @ Kailash Prasad & Ors.
State of Bihar & Anr
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
