Allowed

Vinod Kumar More v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC7 Jul 2017CR. MISC./29683/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, and 384 of the IPC. The bail was subject to specific conditions including the presence of bailors with local immovable property, cooperation in trial, and prohibition of witness tampering.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed subject to furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and specific conditions.

Vinod Kumar More Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29683 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -43 Year- 2014 Thana -NIRMALI District- SUPAUL

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vinod Kumar More, S/o Late Sohan Lal More, Resident of Village- Ward No.4, Nirmali, P.S.- Nirmali, District- Supaul.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶7

====================================================== Appearance :

¶8

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mukeshwar Dayal, A.P.P.

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 07-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶11

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Nirmali P.S. Case No. 43 of 2014 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

¶13

police after investigation submitted charge sheet only under Section 504 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner. The learned Magistrate has taken cognizance for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506 and 384.

¶14

In the written report there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner that he told the driver of the vehicle to make payment of rangdari of Rs.50,000/- per month.

¶15

It is mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition that

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29683 of 2017 (2) dt.07-07-2017

¶17

2/2

¶18

petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Nirmali P.S. Case No. 43 of 2014, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur at Supaul, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶20

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶21

S.Ali/-

¶22

U T

Vinod Kumar More v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Kumar More v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandip Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhiloo Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Kailash Jha and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Intekhab Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar

Jayant Kumar Singh @ Neelmani Vs The State Of Bihar

Niranjan Kumar @ Devendra Rai Vs The State Of Bihar