Allowed

Kailash Jha and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jul 2017CR. MISC./26706/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an order allowing anticipatory bail for four petitioners in a Bihariganj P.S. case involving attempted murder and theft. The court granted bail subject to furnishing bonds and compliance with standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted anticipatory bail upon arrest, subject to bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with sureties and standard conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Kailash Jha and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26706 of 2017 (2) dt.06-07-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26706 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -196 Year- 2016 Thana -BIHARIGANJ District- MADHEPURA

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Kailash Jha, S/o Late Baldeo Jha,

¶6

Bijendra Prasad Singh, S/o Late Koko Singh,

¶7

Kusheshwar Prasad Singh, S/o Late Sadanand Singh.

¶8

Rajeev Kumar Singh, S/o Kusheshwar Prasad Singh, All are Resident of Village- Jotaili, P.S.- Bihariganj, District- Madhepura.

¶9

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶10

Versus

¶11

The State of Bihar.

¶12

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyendra Prasad

¶15

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 06-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶17

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 196 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections307, 379 & other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. There is general and omnibus allegation against both the petitioners.

¶19

From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.

¶20

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is

¶21

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26706 of 2017 (2) dt.06-07-2017

¶22

allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners, named above in the event of their arrest/surrender in the court below within six weeks from today shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 196 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Udakishunganj, Madhepura subject to conditions as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

¶23

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶24

A.K.V./-

¶25

U T

Kailash Jha and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kailash Jha and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Mahto @ Lakhania Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Dulariya Devi @ Dulari Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Sandip Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhiloo Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Imran Khalid Vs The State Of Bihar