Allowed

Dhiloo Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jul 2017CR. MISC./24374/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Dhiloo Choudhary, in a case involving alleged sale of duplicate items under IPC, Copyright Act, and Trade Mark Act. The court advised that seizure items were of general use and no local complaint was registered.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail upon arrest or surrender, furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions.

Dhiloo Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24374 of 2017 (3) dt.06-07-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24374 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2017 Thana -VISHNUPAD District- GAYA

¶4

====================================================== Dhiloo Choudhary .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶5

3 06-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶6

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Vishunpad P.S. Case No. 36 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-420 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections-63/65 of Copy Right Act 1957 and Sections-103, 104 Trade Mark Act 1999.

¶7

As per written report, the informant claims himself to be authorized to take legal action against shopkeeper selling duplicate items. The petitioner was found selling duplicate items in his shop as mentioned in the seizure list.

¶8

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there was no any local complaint against this petitioner of selling duplicate item in his shop. The informant claims himself to be authorized person but no such document has been produced in support of such claim.

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24374 of 2017 (3) dt.06-07-2017

¶10

From the seizure list, it appears that the items shown in the list are of general use.

¶11

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner, named above in the event of his arrest/surrender in the court below within six weeks from today shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Vishunpad P.S. Case No. 36 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya subject to conditions as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶12

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶13

A.K.V./-

¶14

U T

Dhiloo Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhiloo Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Mahto @ Lakhania Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Dulariya Devi @ Dulari Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Sandip Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Kailash Jha and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Imran Khalid Vs The State Of Bihar