Pandav Kumar @ Pandav Kunwar v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed for regular bail in a forgery case, arguing false implication as he was only named later during investigation despite being in judicial custody. Court rejected the bail application.
What did the court decide?
Application for regular bail rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25952 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -102 Year- 2016 Thana -KALYANPUR District- SAMASTIPUR
====================================================== 1. Pandav Kumar @ Pandav Kunwar Son of Sri Vishwanath Mahto, Resident of Village- Ajana, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Shankar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Renuka Ratnakar
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
3 05-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 102 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R his name transpired in this case during the course of investigation.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case, which will appear from the fact that he was not named in the F.I.R, however, he has been named by the victim girl in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. Further petitioner has been in judicial custody since 15.12.2016.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, who was falsely implicated and not named in the FIR, should be released on regular bail.
Whether the applicant should be granted bail in a forgery case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pandav Kumar @ Pandav Kunwar
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Vinod Kumar Sinha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court