Allowed

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Jul 2017CR. MISC./23199/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 302 and 201 IPC. The petitioner was not named in the FIR but was included during investigation, raising no prima facie case for remand against him.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties subject to specified conditions.

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23199 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -307 Year- 2016 Thana -MASAURHI District- PATNA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Yadav S/o Jogeshwar Yadav R/o Kaluchak Srinagar, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

¶10

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 04-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 307/2016, corresponding to S.Tr. No. 130/2017.

¶13

The petitioner is not named in the FIR. His name transpired during course of investigation.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement of co-accused, there is nothing against the petitioner and no recovery is alleged to have been made and further the petitioner has remained in custody for more than eight months.

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23199 of 2017 (3) dt.04-07-2017

¶16

2/2

¶17

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor could not controvert the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶18

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts, stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge II, Patna, in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 307/2016, corresponding to S.Tr. No. 130/2017, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors should be relative of the petitioner and another having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court below with further condition that he will co-operate in disposal of the trial and will make himself available before the court and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without any appropriate reason will be liable for cancellation of his bail.

¶19

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶20

Rakhi

¶21

U T

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramawtar Chaudhary @ Ramautar Chaudhary Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shailendra Kumar @ Shailendra Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramjeet Prasad @ Ramjee Prasad @ Ram Jeevan Prasad Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Kamlesh Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar @ Murabba Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Imran @ Abid @ Imran @ Abid Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.