Allowed

Tabrez @ Habra @ Md. Tabrez v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 Jul 2017CR. MISC./20761/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving theft. The court considered the petitioner's clean antecedents and five months of custody, ordering bail subject to specific conditions including appointing a local surety and refraining from tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail with a bond of Rs. 25,000 and two sureties of the same amount subject to conditions regarding local surety and non-interference with evidence.

Tabrez @ Habra @ Md. Tabrez Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20761 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2017 Thana -KOCHADHAMAN District- KISANGANJ

¶3

======================================================

¶4

TABREZ @ HABRA @ MD. TABREZ Son of Late Kalim, Resident of Village- Gouri Chauk, Police Station- Araria in the district of Araria, at present Resident of L.R.P. Chauk, P.S.- Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 05-07-2017 Heard the parties.

¶13

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Kochadhaman P.S.Case No.19A of 2017 for the offences under Sections 457, 380 & 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Allegation against the petitioner is that the stolen articles

¶15

have been recovered from his house and further the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶16

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has remained in custody for about five months.

¶17

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶18

Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that the

¶19

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20761 of 2017 (3) dt.05-07-2017

¶20

2 / 2

¶21

petitioner has clean antecedent and the petitioner has remained in custody for about five months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Kishanganj in connection with Kochadhaman P.S.Case No.19 of 2017 (G.R.No.242 of 2017).

¶22

With following conditions :

¶23

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

¶24

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

¶25

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

¶26

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

¶27

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶28

chn/-

¶29

Tabrez @ Habra @ Md. Tabrez v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tabrez @ Habra @ Md. Tabrez v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlesh Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar @ Murabba Vs The State Of Bihar

Pramod Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Basant Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Pandav Kumar @ Pandav Kunwar Vs The State Of Bihar