Allowed

Md. Bholu v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC28 Mar 2017CR. MISC./12573/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In bail proceedings arising from a charge of attempt to murder, the Patna High Court allowed the petitioner's application. The court noted the petitioner was only alleged to have pushed the victim down and not to have inflicted a blow with a weapon. Bail was directed on furnishing a bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to enlarge the petitioner on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Md. Bholu Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12573 of 2017 (2) dt.28-03-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12573 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -347 Year- 2016 Thana -LAHERIMUHALLA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF)

¶4

====================================================== Md. Bholu Son of Md. Sadan, Resident of Mohalla-Gagan Diwaan, P.S.Laheri, District-Nalanda.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 28-03-2017 Heard both sides.

¶7

The petitioner seeks bail in Laheri P.S. Case No. 347/2016, registered for the offences punishable under Section 307 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

The informant alleged that Md. Shakil, Md. Shamim and Md. Bholu (petitioner) assaulted his son with sharp-edged weapon, but it appears from perusal of the order of learned Sessions Judge, Nalanda that the injured in para 9 of the casediary disclosed that the petitioner pushed him down on the ground, thereafter, Md. Shakil Mian inflicted blow with sharp-cutting weapon on his neck. The petitioner is not alleged to have given blow with sharp-edged weapon. He is in custody since 08.02.2017.

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12573 of 2017 (2) dt.28-03-2017

¶10

The learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.P.P. however, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner, but did not dispute this fact.

¶11

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ist, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No. 347/2016.

¶12

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.)

¶13

Vinita/U T

Md. Bholu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Bholu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Matiur Rahman @ Matel Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Sarwar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kishundeo Mehta Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramautar Sah and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Mumtaz Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Bhim Ram Vs The State Of Bihar