Allowed

Kishundeo Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Mar 2017CR. MISC./9913/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a rape case. The court noted the police investigation concluded the case was false and cited lack of victim statement and medical evidence against the prosecution.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the Sessions Judge, Supaul.

Kishundeo Mehta Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9913 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -42 Year- 2007 Thana -BHAPATIYAHI District- SUPAUL

¶3

====================================================== 1. Kishundeo Mehta, son of Late Faudi Mehta, resident of Village- Simri, P.S.- Bhaptiyahi, District- Supaul.

¶4

The State of Bihar.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶6

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Khurshid Anwar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶7

3 27-03-2017 Heard both sides.

¶8

The petitioner seeks bail in Bhaptiyahi P.S. case No. 42 of 2007 under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

The informant made allegation that while she was crossing through a field, the petitioner committed rape with her. She further alleged that petitioner had earlier established physical relation with her on the pretext of marrying with her.

¶10

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after investigation of the case, the police submitted final form finding the case false against the petitioner on 31.03.2009 but the learned court below took cognizance against the petitioner. The victim did not make her statement under Section 164 of the Cr. P. C. The medical evidence also does not support the prosecution

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9913 of 2017 (3) dt.27-03-2017

¶12

2/2

¶13

story of rape with the victim.

¶14

Having considered the facts aforesaid and the fact that police after investigation submitted final form finding the case false against the petitioner but cognizance was taken, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Supaul in S. T. No. 18 of 2017, arising out of Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No. 42 of 2007.

¶15

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶16

BKS/-

¶17

U T

Kishundeo Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishundeo Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishor Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Kamlesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Babloo Dubey @ Mithelesh Dubey Vs The State Of Bihar

Matiur Rahman @ Matel Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Sarwar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjeev Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar