Allowed

Bhim Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC28 Mar 2017CR. MISC./11661/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition, an accused facing charges under sections 363 and 366 IPC sought bail. The Court observed that the victim, being a major, voluntarily accompanied the petitioner. Consequently, bail was granted upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Bhim Ram Vs The State Of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11661 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -139 Year- 2015 Thana -BHARGAMA District- ARRARIA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Bhim Ram S/o Murari Ram, Resident of Village-Aliganj (Magrujal), P.S.-Barhara Kothi, District-Purnea

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Naushad Uzzoha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ashlam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 28-03-2017 Heard both sides.

¶10

The petitioner seeks bail in Bhargama P.S. case No. 139 of 2015 under Section 363, 366 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

The informant alleged that his daughter had gone to bank to withdraw money but she did not return. The informant named the petitioner that he kidnapped his daughter for the purpose of marriage.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the victim made her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. and she disclosed her date of birth as 09.11.1995. She further disclosed that petitioner assured her to marry but the petitioner disclosed that he was married earlier then she did not agree to

¶13

marry with the petitioner thereafter petitioner left her to her house.

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11661 of 2017 (3) dt.28-03-2017

¶15

2/2

¶16

Considering the facts that victim appears to be a major and she voluntarily went along with the petitioner, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Araria in S.T. No. 693 of 2015, arising out of Bhargama P.S. Case No. 139 of 2015.

¶17

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶18

BKS/-

¶19

U T

Bhim Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhim Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Matiur Rahman @ Matel Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Sarwar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kishundeo Mehta Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramautar Sah and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Bholu Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Mumtaz Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.