Allowed

Deepak Kumar @ Amardeep Kumar @ Amardeep v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC18 Mar 2017CR. MISC./11879/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna allowed bail to the petitioner in a theft case where a motorcycle was recovered from school premises. The court said the petitioner was not in conscious possession, had no antecedents, and has been in jail for two months. Bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties was required.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the C.J.M., Munger.

Deepak Kumar @ Amardeep Kumar @ Amardeep Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11879 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2017 Thana -KASIMBAZAR District- MUNGER

¶3

====================================================== Deepak Kumar @ Amardeep Kumar @ Amardeep, son of Rajeev Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Purani Ganj Naya Tola, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ajay Kumar-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 18-03-2017 Heard both sides.

¶6

The petitioner seeks bail in Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 08 of 2017 registered under Sections 401, 411, 413, 414, 467, 468 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

The informant alleged that he got information that the petitioner and other accused peons are indulged in committing theft of motorcycle and selling them. The informant also got information that one motorcycle was theft by the petitioner. On search, school premises was raided and from there motorcycle bearing registration no. BR 10D 2457 was recovered. The petitioner is said to have disclosed that he took the motorcycle from Sudarshan Kumar @ Gulshan.

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11879 of 2017 (2) dt.18-03-2017

¶9

2/2

¶10

Leanred counsel for the petitioner submits that the motorcycle was recovered from the premises of the school and not from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in jail for last two months and he has got no criminal antecedent.

¶11

Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 08 of 2017.

¶12

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶13

Mishra/-

¶14

U T

Deepak Kumar @ Amardeep Kumar @ Amardeep v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Kumar @ Amardeep Kumar @ Amardeep v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kavi Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramdeo Bhagat Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Mahendra Prasad Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Sandeep Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar

Baijnath Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhim Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar