Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a petition filed for quashing a criminal order. The court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition as withdrawn.
None. Petitioner withdrew the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2557 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -529 Year- 2013 Thana -WAJIRGANJ District- GAYA
======================================================
Mahendra Prasad Yadav S/o Late Nanhak Yadav Resident of Village Ashrain, P.S. Wazirganj, District Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Roy, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
After some argument, Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition filed for quashing the order by which cognizance has been taken against the petitioner under Section 7 of the E.C. Act with liberty to raise all the points at the time of framing of charge. The quashing petition stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
Mishra/-
U
Mahendra Prasad Yadav
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
