The Patna High Court dismissed a civil miscellaneous application seeking interference under supervisory jurisdiction, holding that grounds for transferring a title appeal were baseless and absurd.
Civil Miscellaneous Application No.839 of 2016 dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.839 of 2016 (2) dt.17-10-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.839 of 2016
| ====================================================== Umakant Mishra & Anr .... .... Appellant/s Versus |
|
|---|---|
| Bhagwan Sah .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 17 |
-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. |
| Perused the order dated 13.06.2016 passed by the | |
| learned District Judge, East Champaran, Motihari in Civil | |
| Miscellaneous Transfer Petition No. 30 of 2016, whereby the | |
| learned court below refused to transfer the title appeal to another competent appellate court. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that |
|
| the court below found the grounds for transfer are baseless and absurd. |
|
| In view of the above facts and circumstances of the | |
| case, this is not a case for interference in exercise of supervisory | |
| jurisdiction. Thus, this civil miscellaneous application is | |
| dismissed. | |
| brajesh/- U |
(Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) |
Umakant Mishra
Bhagwan Sah
Mungeshwar Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
