Disposed

Babulal Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC13 Jan 2016CWJC/7431/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought permission to withdraw his Public Interest Litigation writ petition filed under Article 226. The High Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to approach appropriate authorities if advised, while reserving its opinion on the petition's merits.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate authority if advised.

Babulal Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7431 of 2015

¶3

====================================================== Babulal Ram son of Late Bhadai Ram resident of village - Sondihara, Post Office- Mumbai, P.S. Bhabua, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Building construction Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Deparrtment (Higher Education Department), Bihar Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua. null null 4. The District Education Officer, Kaimur at Bhabua null null 5. The District Programme Officer, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Kaimur at Bhabua. 6. The District Programme Officer, Public Complaint cell, (Education Department), Kaimur at Bhaua. 7. Md. Hafiz, In charge Principal, Upgraded Middle School, Sondihara, Block- BHabua, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, Advocate For the Respondent State: Mr. P.K. Verma, AAG-5 Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, AC to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH

¶4

ORAL ORDER

¶5

(Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶6

2 13-01-2016 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. P.K. Verma, learned Additional Advocate General No.5, appearing for the State respondents.

¶7

After some arguments, Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application, made, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if

¶8

Patna High Court CWJC No.7431 of 2015 (2) dt.13-01-2016

¶9

2/2

¶10

so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

¶11

No objection has been raised by the respondents to

¶12

the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

¶13

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

¶14

However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition.

¶15

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ)

¶16

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶17

Pawan/-

¶18

Babulal Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babulal Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Ranjan Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Upendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramashankar Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dhirendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ranjeet Kumar Verma Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Prabha Sharan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.