The Patna High Court allowed the withdrawal of a public interest litigation filed by Rohit Ranjan under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court granted liberty to approach the appropriate authority.
Withdrawal of the writ application allowed with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4026 of 2015
====================================================== Rohit Ranjan, son of Raja Nand Paswan, resident of village- Lahbanganj, P.S. - Simraha, District- Araria. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of India, New Delhi. 2. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The J.K. Trust Gram Vikash Yojana, House no. 5D/21, Near Bhagwantkunj Apartment, North S.K. Puri, Boring Road, Patna- 13 through its Incharge. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent No.1 : Mr. Awadesh Kumar Pandey, SCGC Mr. Ravinder Kumar Sharma, CGC For the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3: Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary, AAG-13 Mr. Anil Kumar Tiwary, AC to AAG-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
Patna High Court CWJC No.4026 of 2015 (2) dt.12-01-2016
2/2
in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition.
(I.A. Ansari, ACJ)
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
Pawan/-
U
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the withdrawal of the public interest litigation filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Whether liberty should be granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with an appropriate application.
Whether to record any opinion on the merits of the present writ petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rohit Ranjan
The Union of India
The State of Bihar
The Acting Chief Justice
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
