Disposed

Dhirendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC13 Jan 2016CWJC/5694/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 regarding alleged irregularities in the Bihar Minor Water Resources Department. The court closed proceedings as disciplinary/criminal actions were initiated, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the court if actions were not concluded. Observations were not on the fin

What did the court decide?

Closed the proceedings with liberty to petitioner to approach the Court if disciplinary/criminal actions were not brought to logical conclusion.

Dhirendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Public Procurement and Tenders | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5694 of 2015

¶2

====================================================== 1. Dhirendra Kumar, Son of Sri Suresh Prasad Singh, resident of Chanakyapuri Colony, Gaya, Police Station- Rampur in the district of Gaya. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Minor Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Minor Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Project Co-Ordinator, Tube Well Wing, Bishvesbaraiya Bhawan, Patna. 4. The Chief Engineer (North), Tube Well, Muzaffarpur. 5. The Superintending Engineer (North), Tube Well Circle, Muzaffarpur. 6. The Executive Engineer, Tube Well Division, Siwan. 7. The Secretary, Cabinet Vigilance, Government of Police, Vigilance, Government of Bihar, Patna. 8. The Additional Director General of Police, Vigilance, Government of Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar- AAG-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE )

¶3

2 13-01-2016 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned Additional Advocate General No. 6, appearing for the State-respondents.

¶4

In view of the fact that the State-respondents have averred, in their counter affidavit filed in this writ petition, made under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the form of PIL, to the effect that following preliminary enquiry, disciplinary actions have been initiated against erring officials, who have been identified under report of the Enquiry Committee and that First Information Report will be lodged, when the enquiry report from

¶5

Patna High Court CWJC No.5694 of 2015 (2) dt.13-01-2016

¶6

¶7

the Vigilance Department is received, we, in view of the above and in the interest of justice, close this proceeding with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application if the disciplinary proceedings aforementioned are not brought to their logical conclusion in accordance with law and if no criminal action is initiated against the erring persons.

¶8

Nothwithstanding what we have directed, it shall remain open to the petitioner to lodge First Information Report or take recourse to such other provisions of law as may be permissible for the purpose of initiating criminal or civil action against the erring persons.

¶9

We may, however, make it clear that the observations made hereinabove and the directions given shall not be considered as our final opinion in respect of culpability of the persons, who have been identified as the erring persons in the functioning of the Water Resources Department, Minor Irrigation Tube Well Division, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶11

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ)

¶12

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶13

A.I./-

¶14

Dhirendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhirendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Ranjan Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Upendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramashankar Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ranjeet Kumar Verma Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Prabha Sharan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Babulal Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.