Allowed

M/S Magadh Mechanical Private v. the Managing Director,Bihar St

Patna HC10 Aug 2016CWJC/7382/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna disposed of this writ petition by directing the respondent Bihar State Credit and Investment Corporation Ltd. to verify the petitioner's calculation claim and grant the detailed final calculation of the Central Capital Subsidy with an opportunity of hearing, relying on a prior order.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent BICICO to consider petitioner's calculation, grant detailed final calculation of Central Capital Subsidy after verification and hearing.

M/S Magadh Mechanical Private Vs the Managing… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7382 of 2012

¶3

=========================================================== M/s Magadh Mechanical Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Provisions of Companies Act, 1956 having its Head Office and Industrial Unit Situated at Kharuara, P.O. Chero, Distt. Nalanda through it's Managing Director, Birendra Prasad Singh, S/O Sri Bindeshwar Prasad Singh R/O Village-Sartha, P.S. Chand, District-Nalanda

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶5

The Managing Director, Bihar State Credit and Investment Corporation Ltd., Indira Bhawan, 4th Floor, Ram Charitra Singh Path, Patna

¶6

.... .... Respondent/s

¶7

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mayank Shekhar, Adv.

¶8

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-08-2016

¶9

The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent-Bihar State Credit and Investment Corporation Limited (for short, “BICICO”) to furnish the accounting of Central Capital Subsidy retained by it; for a direction to the respondent-BICICO to compensate the petitioner for unjust retention of benefit of the Central Capital Subsidy; and for connected reliefs.

¶10

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Arbind Kumar Jha, submits that a calculation has been made on the basis of the petitioner’s claim which has been submitted to learned counsel for the respondent BICICO for verification. A plain copy of such calculation is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner and is placed on record.

¶11

Patna High Court CWJC No.7382 of 2012 dt.10-08-2016

¶12

2/2

¶13

Having regard to the nature of the grievance raised in the writ petition and with the consent of parties, the writ petition stands disposed with a direction to the respondent BICICO to consider the aforesaid calculation of the petitioner and dispose of the matter after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The respondent BICICO shall, after necessary verification, grant the petitioner the detailed final calculation relating to the Central Capital Subsidy, having regard to the principles contained in the order dated 24.08.2006 passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 8353 of 2004.

¶14

The writ petition stands disposed in the aforesaid terms.

¶15

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶16

Md. Ibrarul/-Chandran

¶17

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N.A.
Uploading Date	11.08.2016
Transmission Date	N.A.

M/S Magadh Mechanical Private v. the Managing Director,Bihar St

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Magadh Mechanical Private v. the Managing Director,Bihar St

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jawahar Chaudhary Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Vijay Bahadur Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Nawlesh Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Arvind Kumar Vs The Central Bank Of India and Ors.

Raktu Manjhi @ Jay Shankar Manjhi @ Jai Shankar Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar