The Patna High Court dismissed a bail renewal petition filed by Raktu Manjhi in PS. Case No. 92 of 2015. The court found no reason to alter the earlier order dated 16.10.2015 that rejected the initial bail application.
Bail petition dismissed; earlier order dated 16.10.2015 stands affirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19359 of 2016 (3) dt.10-08-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19359 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -92 Year- 2015 Thana -RIVILGANJ District- SARAN ====================================================== Raktu Manjhi @ Jay Shankar Manjhi @ Jai Shankar Prasad son of Late Bishwanath Manjhi, Resident of village- Mohammadpur, P.S.- Revilganj, District- Saran at Chapra (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 3 10-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Revilganj P.S. Case No. 92 of 2015 for the offences alleged under Sections 363, 366(A), 127(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 16.10.2015 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 37216 of 2015. 3. Having regard to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court finds no reason to take a different view in the matter. The bail petition stands dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in connection with PS. Case No. 92 of 2015 involving offences under Sections 363, 366(A), 127(B), and 34 of the IPC?
Whether there is any reason to vary the bail order dated 16.10.2015 rejecting the earlier bail petition?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raktu Manjhi @ Jay Shankar Manjhi @ Jai Shankar Prasad
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
