The High Court of Patna withdrew a writ petition filed by Arvind Kumar challenging a Recovery Officer's order and auction notice after he sought leave to withdraw it to approach the appropriate forum.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12679 of 2016
======================================================
Arvind Kumar, Son of Late Mewa Lal Sao, resident of Opposite Nageshwar Mall & Multiplex, Ramchandrapur, P.S.- Bihar Sharif, District- Nalanda.
.... .... Petitioner Versus
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Verma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Prashant Sinha, Advocate
For the Resp. Bank : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 10-08-2016 After some arguments learned senior counsel for the petitioner Mr. Rajeev Kumar Verma, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievances in connection with the impugned order dated 08.07.2016 in R.P. No. 92 of 2014 passed by the Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Patna (Annexure-8) and the impugned auction notice dated 22.07.2016 (Annexure-9).
Patna High Court CWJC No.12679 of 2016 (2) dt.10-08-2016
2
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran
U
Arvind Kumar
The Central Bank of India
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
