M/s Sri Ram Enterprises v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5871 of 2013
============================================================ M/S Sri Ram Enterprises, a partnership firm having its office at 5th Floor, Sadbhawana, A.C. Road, Bhagalpur, Post Office and District Bhagalpur through its authorized representative Sri Giriraj Sharma, son of Late Ammi Lal Sharma, Resident of Jagarnath Suri Lane Mandroja, P.O. Bhagalpur, P.S. Tatarpur, District Bhagalpur.
.... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary cum Commissioner, Department of Rural Works, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Engineer in Chief, Department of Rural Works, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Chief Engineer-II, Department of Rural Works, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Superintending Engineer, Department of Rural Works, Govt. of Bihar, Purnia.
- The Executive Engineer, Department of rural Works, Baisi.
.... .... Respondents ============================================================ Appearance: For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kejriwal, Mr. Zahid Hussain, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Subhash Kr. Singh, GA 3
============================================================ CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 08-08-2016
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s Sri Ram Enterprises
- respondent
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary cum Commissioner, Department of Rural Works
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court