Disposed

Sushil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC5 Aug 2016CWJC/20945/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought correction of the petitioner's date of birth on his matriculation certificate. The court disposed of the application directing the respondent Board to issue a duplicate certificate with the corrected date within three weeks if the petitioner submits an affidavit regarding the missing original.

What did the court decide?

Directive to issue duplicate matriculation certificate with corrected date of birth within three weeks subject to submission of affidavit regarding missing original.

Sushil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

Patna High Court CWJC No.20945 of 2013 dt.05-08-2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20945 of 2013

¶4

=========================================================== Sushil Kumar S/O Late Dip Narayan Sah Resident Of Village Kamtaul, P.S. Kamtaul, District Darbhanga.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar (Through The Director Education Department, Patna).

¶8

The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Buddha Marg, Patna.

¶9

The Secretary Bihar School Examination Board, Buddha Marg, Patna.

¶10

The Deputy Secretary Bihar School Examination Board, Buddha Marg, Patna.

¶11

The Headmaster, High School Ujjan, Post Lohna Road, District Darbhanga.

¶12

.... .... Respondent/s

¶13

=========================================================== Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Piyush Lall, Adv.

¶15

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL JUDGMENT

¶16

Date: 05-08-2016

¶17

Heard Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Jha, for the petitioner and Mrs. Binita Singh for the respondent Bihar School Examination Board ( in short „Board‟).

¶18

In the light of previous order(s) a supplementary affidavit on behalf of the respondents 2 to 4 is filed. The respondents in paragraph 6 have stated as under :

¶19

“That it was in the said circumstances, particularly in view of the order dated 01.07.2016 passed by this Hon‟ble Court that it was decided to make necessary correction in the date of birth as 02.04.1973 replying upon the entries made in the original receipt of registration and the duplicate school leaving certificate”.

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.20945 of 2013 dt.05-08-2016

¶21

The writ application prays for correction in the date of birth of the petitioner incorporated in the matriculation certificate issued by the respondent Board.

¶22

The counsel for the petitioner states that if there is any difficulty in doing so presenting the original certificate he shall apply for the duplicate certificate annexing the affidavit with regard to missing of the original certificate. Once the petitioner does so, the respondent authority of the Board shall take appropriate steps as provided under its regulation for issuing a duplicate certificate with corrected date of birth within three weeks from the completion of the formalities in this regard.

¶23

Writ application is disposed off.

¶24

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)

¶25

Prakash/U

Sushil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhirendra Narayan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shiv Shankar Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ajit Manjhi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kesho Prasad Singh @ Keshaw Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Champaran Yuva Kalyan Society Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shambhu Sharan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.