In a civil writ petition, the High Court of Patna allowed the withdrawal of the application as the petitioners rendered it infructuous.
Permission to withdraw the writ application was granted, and the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2574 of 2014
====================================================== 1. Ajit Manjhi Son Of Chutar Manjhi Resident Of Village - Navadih, P.S. Gidhaur, District - Jamui 2. Sanjay Manjhi Son Of Shankar Manjhi Resident Of Village - Navadih, P.S. Gidhaur, District - Jamui
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gp-22 Gayan Prakash Ojha
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER
2 04-08-2016 Both sides present. Counsel for the petitioners, on instruction, states that the writ application has become infructuous. He, therefore, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the application. As prayed, the application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
Pankaj/U
Ajit Manjhi
Sanjay Manjhi
Ghutan Manjhi
Shivdani Manjhi
Dhaturi Manjhi
Lilo Manjhi
Kishore Kumar Mandal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
