Allowed

Ratan Kumar and Ors. v. The Chairman Central Bank Of India and Ors.

Patna HC21 Jan 2016CWJC/16666/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed a writ petition seeking appointment letters for selected candidates, including petitioners. The Court applied principles from a previous case (CWJC No.19524 of 2014) and directed respondents to issue appointment letters within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to issue appointment letters in favour of selected candidates including petitioners within eight weeks from date of production of copy of this order.

Ratan Kumar and Ors. Vs The Chairman Central Bank Of… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

Patna High Court CWJC No.16666 of 2014 dt.21-01-2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16666 of 2014

¶4

===========================================================

¶5

Ratan Kumar son of Shri Prabhunath Pandey, resident of Village – Karagahiya Purwi, P O – Bettiah, P S – Bettiah Mofussil, District – West Champaran.

¶6

Manish Ranjan son of Shri Anirudh Prasad, resident of Village – Somgadh Anchal – Narakatiyaganj, P O & P S - Sathi, District – West Champaran.

¶7

Dinesh Prasad son of Sri Raghunath Sah, resident of Village – Hardiya, P O – Kehunia, P S – Shikarpur, District – West Champaran.

¶8

Aniket Rakesh son of Shri Rakesh Kumar Pandey, resident of Village - Lal Bazar, Ward No. 1, P.O. Bettiah, P S – Bettiah Nagar, District – West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

The Chairman, Central Bank of India, Pawapuri, Mumbai.

¶11

The Zonal Manager, Central Bank of India, Muzaffarpur.

¶12

The Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Balua Tal, Motihari.

¶13

The Deputy Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Balua Tal, Motihari.

¶14

The Senior Manager, Central Bank of India, Motihari.

¶15

.... .... Respondent/s

¶16

=========================================================== Appearance :

¶17

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Agrawal For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha

¶18

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT

¶19

Date: 21-01-2016

¶20

Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the Bank.

¶21

The rationale and reasoning provided by this Court in CWJC No.19524 of 2014, decided on 24/11/2015, shall also apply to the present writ application keeping in mind that the assertion and the relief is identical in nature.

¶22

Writ application is allowed with a direction upon the respondents that they will issue the appointment letters in favour of the selected candidates including these petitioners, within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order.

¶23

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)

¶24

R.K.Pathak/U

Ratan Kumar and Ors. v. The Chairman Central Bank Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ratan Kumar and Ors. v. The Chairman Central Bank Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Upendra Singh Vs Dr.sunil Kumar Singh and Ors.

Manish Saw Vs The State Of Bihar

Prince Kumar Vs The Patna University Patna and Ors.

Mahesh Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Aurangjeb Alias Chand Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.