In an Article 226 writ petition, the Patna High Court examined the legality of an order rejecting a prayer for transfer of suit. Finding no illegality or jurisdictional error, the court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15438 of 2014
====================================================== Pintu Kumar S/o Sri Vijay Thakur, resident of Mohalla- Marufganj, Ward No. 22, New Municipality Saharsa, P.S. and District- Saharsa
.... .... Petitioner/s
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarnath Jha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER
petitioner.
The legal sustainability of the impugned order by which the learned court below has rejected the prayer of the petitioner for transfer of the suit has been questioned in this
Patna High Court CWJC No.15438 of 2014 (2) dt.26-10-2016
2
application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
After considering the submissions and perusal of the impugned order, this Court does not find that any illegality or error of jurisdiction in the impugned order.
The application is, accordingly, dismissed.
(V. Nath, J) Devendra/U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order rejecting the prayer for transfer of the suit suffers from any illegality or error of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution.
Pintu Kumar
Sri Mati Soni Devi
Ashok Kumar Swarnakar
Rajesh Kumar Swarnakar
Vinod Kumar Swarnashri
Dilip Swarna Shri
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
