The single judge of the Patna High Court dismissed this Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case as infructuous upon the petitioner's submission that the application has become pointless.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.15175 of 2014 (2) dt.25-10-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15175 of 2014
====================================================== Nathun Mahto son of Late Ramjeevan Mahto resident of village Kanchanpur Tola, Noniyari Bigha Post Office Kashimpur Tetaria Police Station Barun District Aurangabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER
2 25-10-2016 Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this application has become infructuous.
The application is, accordingly, dismissed as
infructuous.
(V. Nath, J)
Devendra/-
U
Nathun Mahto
Raj Mohan Singh
Panchu Mahto
Bijay Mahto
Sujia Devi
Deoki Singh
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
