Nawal Kishore Prasad and Ors. v. Sudhist Prasad Gupta and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought Article 227 intervention to rectify a typographical error in their written statement regarding the oral partition date. The court declined interference as the motion was filed after cross-examination had commenced and no mistake was established.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15414 of 2014
===========================================================
- Nawal Kishore Prasad S/o Gauri Shankar Prasad
- Arun Kumar
- Deepak Kumar Both S/o Nawal Kishore Prasad All Resident of Village Karamawa, P.O. Karamawa, P.S. Majhaulia, District West Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
- Sudhist Prasad Gupta
- Mohan Kumar Gupta
- Manoj Kumar Gupta All S/o Raja Ram Sah All Resident of Village Karamawa, P.O. Karamawa, P.S. Majhaulia, District West Champaran.
- Smt. Manju Devi W/o Uday Shankar Resident of Village Karamawa, P.O. Karamawa, P.S. Majhaulia, District West Champaran.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should invoke its jurisdiction under Article 227 to allow amendment of the written statement changing the date of oral partition from 1998 to 1992.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nawal Kishore Prasad
- petitioner
Arun Kumar
- petitioner
Deepak Kumar Both
- respondent
Sudhist Prasad Gupta
- respondent
Mohan Kumar Gupta
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court