Single judge ordered at Patna disposed of a writ petition under Article 226/227 seeking to quash an impugned order. The court found no illegality or irregularity and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.15356 of 2014 (3) dt.27-10-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15356 of 2014
====================================================== 1. Imteyazul Haque. 2. Anwarul Haque. 3. Israrul Haque, all are son of S.K. Mahmood. 4. Habsa Khatoon, D/o S.K. Mahmood, all are resident of Siswa Tola Kachahariya, P.S. Banjariya, District-East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Md. Jamil Akhtar. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ansul For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER
3 27-10-2016 Heard. After considering the submission and perusal of the impugned order, this Court is not persuaded to interdict the impugned order under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order could be shown or established on behalf of the petitioners.
This application is, accordingly dismissed.
(V. Nath, J)
Devendra/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Article 227 of the Constitution of India warrants interference to quash the impugned order on grounds of illegality or irregularity.
Imteyazul Haque
Anwarul Haque
Israrul Haque
Habsa Khatoon
Md. Jamil Akhtar
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
