Dismissed

Dip Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC22 Aug 2016CWJC/1189/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition challenging the transfer of petitioner's land to a school, the Court found no material to granting relief as inquiry was already pending. It disposed of the application permitting the petitioner to pursue his case before the District Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

The writ application is disposed of and the petitioner is permitted to pursue his case before the District Magistrate.

Dip Narayan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Public Procurement and Tenders | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1189 of 2014

¶2

====================================================== Dip Narayan Yadav, Son Of Late Bhagwat Yadav, Resident Of VillageNandlali, P.S.- Bihra, District- Saharsa

¶3

.... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna 4. The Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa 5. The District Magistrate, Saharsa

¶4

The District Revenue Officer, Saharsa 7. The District Programme Officer, Establishment cum District Superintendent Of Education, Saharsa 8. The Block Development Officer, Sattar Kataiya, District- Saharsa 9. The Circle Officer, Sattar Kataiya, Distrirct- Saharsa 10. The Headmaster, Nav Srijit Prathmik Vidyalaya, Nandlali P.S. Bihra, District- Saharsa

¶5

.... .... Respondent/s

¶6

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Madhukar Krishna Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER

¶7

3 22-08-2016 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and SC-12 for the

¶8

State. The grievances is that the land of the petitioner has been treated by the respondent-State as the ‘Gairmajarua Khas Land’ and granted permission to transfer the land to newly created primary school. Except an order passed by the consolidation authority in 1988, nothing has been placed on record enabling the court to consider the said claim of the petitioner.

¶9

Patna High Court CWJC No.1189 of 2014 (3) dt.22-08-2016

¶10

2/2

¶11

On the basis of the pleadings made in the writ application, it is difficult for this Court to grant any relief. However, from the counter affidavit, it appears that an inquiry to ascertain the status of the land has been ordered by the District Magistrate, which is said to be pending.

¶12

In my view, the ends of justice shall be subserved if the petitioner is permitted to pursue his case before the respondent District Magistrate, who has already ignited an inquiry.

¶13

Needless to observe if it is found that the subject land is not the government land, the concerned respondent will pass appropriate order exonerating the land of the petitioner from being made over to the school in question.

¶14

The writ application is disposed of.

¶15

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J.)

¶16

ravi/-

¶17

Dip Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dip Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Shankar Tiwari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Jalawati Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Naresh Prasad Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Asha Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhotu Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Sheshnath Yadav and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.