In a writ petition, the petitioner sought to withdraw the application after stating the grievance was redressed during pendency. The court dismissed the writ application on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1364 of 2015
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lalit Narayan Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.K. Sinha, GP-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER
2 20-08-2016 Mr. Arun Kumar Jha for the petitioner, looking to the statements made in the counter affidavit as also on instruction, states that the grievance of the petitioner(s) has been redressed during the pendency of the writ petition. He, therefore, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ application. As prayed, the writ application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
Shyam/-
U
Jalawati Devi
The State of Bihar
KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
