In Criminal Revision No.370 of 2015, a full bench reversed the lower court decision on the grounds that the petitioner had absconded and five other cases were pending against him, thus dismissing the revision petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No.370 of 2015
=========================================================== Raja Babu Bhagat @ Raja Babu @ Raja Bhagat, S/O Maya Bhagat. Resident of Village - Shukul Dumar, P.S.- Bhore, District - Gopalganj, through his father and natural guardian namely Maya Bhagat. S/O Late Dukh Haran Bhagat. Resident of Village - Shukul Dumar, P.S.- Bhore, District - Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. S. Dayal, A.P.P.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 03-02-2016
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.
The Petitioner seeks revision of the order dated
25.2.2015 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, in Criminal Appeal No. 22 of 2015 upholding the order dated 22.12.2014 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) Gopalganj, in J.E. Case No. 184 of 2014.
In view of the conduct of the Petitioner of having absconded from the Remand Home and five other cases pending against him, I am not inclined to interfere in the order dated 25.2.2015 passed by the Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, in Cr. Apeal No. 22 of 2015.
The application stands dismissed.
(Anjana Prakash, J)
S.Ali/U T
Raja Babu Bhagat
The State of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
