In an oral order, the Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's criminal revision application dated 12-05-2016 seeking revision of an order passed by the Additional District Judge, Patna City on 19-02-2015, finding no reason for interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.229 of 2015 (2) dt.12-05-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.229 of 2015 ====================================================== Hassan Mansoori S/o Abdul Hamad Mansoori. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Upendra Kuamr (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2 12-05-2016 The petitioner seeks revision of the order dated 19.02.2015 passed by the Additional District Judge 1st , Patna City in Sessions Trial No. 529 of 2014. Having gone through the records of the case I see no reasons for interference. Hence the application stands rejected.
(Anjana Prakash, J)
Prakash/-
U T
Hassan Mansoori
The State of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
