Allowed

Anmol Paswan and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC12 May 2016CR. MISC./50826/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition, the High Court allowed the application and set aside the order of cognizance dated 01.04.2009 passed in Complaint Case No. 962C of 2008 against the petitioners. The court considered the nature of allegations and the domestic background of the dispute.

What did the court decide?

Order of cognizance dated 01.04.2009 passed in Complaint Case No. 962C of 2008 is set aside so far as the petitioners are concerned. The application is allowed.

Anmol Paswan and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Domestic Violence | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50826 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -962 Year- 2008 Thana -MADHEPURA COMPALINT CASE DistrictMADHEPURA =========================================================== 1. Anmol Paswan S/o Jyoti Paswan 2. Jyoti Paswan S/o Late Punni Paswan 3. Renu Devi W/o Kapildeo Paswan 4. Sunita Devi W/o Anmol Paswan 5. Sita Devi W/o Jyoti Paswan All Resident of Village Nainpatti, Police Station Srinagar, District Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Bhagya Devi wife of Baldeo Paswan. .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. C. Jawahar, APP For the Informant : Mr. Amlika Bhagat, Adv ===========================================================

¶3

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 12-05-2016

¶4

The petitioners who are the in-laws seek quashing of the order of cognizance dated 01.04.2009 passed in Complaint Case No. 962C of 2008 by the Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Madhepura.

¶5

The case of the complainant is that she was married with one Kapildeo Paswan and out of the wedlock two children were born. However, the husband remarried one Renu Devi and started torturing and assaulting her due to which she filed Misc. Case No. 20 of 1991 under Section 125 Cr.P.C for maintenance. She was then pressurized to compromise and also threatened for which she filed the Complaint

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50826 of 2014 dt.12-05-2016

¶7

2/2

¶8

Case no. 800 of 2008. She narrated that on 10.11.2008 while she had gone to the western side of her house along with her daughter accused persons came there and started assaulting her.

¶9

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that it is evident that the dispute was between the husband and wife and it is impossible to believe that the family members would have any role in their relationship even after birth of two children.

¶10

On the other hand the complainant submits that since the application for quashing the order of cognizance on behalf of the husband stood dismissed by this Court, the present application should also be dismissed.

¶11

Having considered the nature of allegation and the background fact and also the duration of the marriage, the application is allowed and the order of cognizance dated 01.04.2009 passed in Complaint Case No. 962C of 2008 by the Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Madhepura, so far as the petitioners are concerned is hereby set aside.

¶12

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶13

Prakash/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE NA
Uploading Date 25.05.2016
Transmission Date 25.05.2016

Anmol Paswan and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anmol Paswan and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Rahman Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Avanish Kumar @ Sonu @ Ashvini Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Birendra Mistri Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Hassan Mansoori Vs The State Of Bihar

Kailashi Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Utpal Kumar Vimal and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.