Allowed

Utpal Kumar Vimal and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC12 May 2016CR. MISC./47731/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioners sought quashing of the order of cognizance in a complaint case arising from a matrimonial dispute. As the dispute was resolved and no respondent appeared to refute this, the high court allowed the application and set aside the order of cognizance.

What did the court decide?

The order of cognizance dated 22.07.2013 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Complaint Case No. 1451C of 2013, is set aside.

Utpal Kumar Vimal and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47731 of 2014

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1451 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA

¶4

=========================================================== 1. Utpal Kumar Vimal Son of Sharan Prasad Srivastav

¶5

Mamata Kumari Wife of Utapal Kumar Vimal Both Resident of 412, Manchahat Apartment, Plot no.- 42 Sector no.- 10 Dwarika New Delhi 75

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Sukriti Srivastwa Wife of Dipak Kumar Daughter of Pyare Mohan Mehata Resident of M.I.G. 99, P.S.- Kankarbag, District- Patna

¶9

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶10

with

¶11

=========================================================== Criminal Miscellaneous No. 15724 of 2015

¶12

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1451 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA

¶13

=========================================================== 1. Dipak Kumar son of Triloki Nath Verma Sharan Resident of Village - Haraji P.S. Awatar Nagar, District - Saran.

¶14

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶15

Versus

¶16

The State of Bihar.

¶17

Sukriti Srivastava wife of Dipak Kumar daughter of Pyare Mohan Mehta resident of M.I.G. 99, P.S. Kankarbag, District Patna.

¶18

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶19

=========================================================== Appearance : (In Cr.Misc. No. 47731 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. (In Cr.Misc. No. 15724 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 12-05-2016

¶20

The petitioners seek quashing of the order of cognizance

¶21

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47731 of 2014 dt.12-05-2016

¶22

2/2

¶23

dated 22.07.2013 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Complaint Case No. 1451C of 2013.

¶24

A supplementary affidavit has been filed stating therein that the matrimonial dispute has now been resolved. However, no one appears on behalf of the complainant to refute this submission.

¶25

Accepting the stand of the petitioners, the application is allowed and the order of cognizance dated 22.07.2013 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Complaint Case No. 1451C of 2013, is hereby set aside.

¶26

The parties are directed to comply with the terms of the

¶27

agreement.

¶28

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶29

Prakash/-
AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAVDATE	NA
UploadingDate	19.05.2016
Transmission Date	19.05.2016

Utpal Kumar Vimal and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Utpal Kumar Vimal and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Rahman Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Avanish Kumar @ Sonu @ Ashvini Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Birendra Mistri Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Hassan Mansoori Vs The State Of Bihar

Kailashi Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anmol Paswan and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.