Allowed

Dilip Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC3 May 2016CR. MISC./9710/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Oral bail order granting release to the petitioner, an accused in Siwan P.S. Case No. 300 of 2015 (Section 366(A)/34 IPC) concerning alleged enticement of a minor. Counsel submitted the petitioner is the uncle of the co-accused and faces no independent allegations of overt misbehavior.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Dilip Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9710 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -300 Year- 2015 Thana -SIWAN CITY District- SIWAN ====================================================== Dilip Kumar Yadav, Son of Ashok Yadav, Resident of Sakeen- Laxmipur, Andhar Dhala, P.S. Siwan Nagar, District-Siwan. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anurag Saurav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 03-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is accused in connection with Siwan (Town) P.S. Case No. 300 of 2015, registered under Section 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3

The accusation is of enticing the minor daughter of the informant by this petitioner and one Vijay Kumar Yadav.

¶4

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in fact, the petitioner is the nephew of co-accused Vijay Kumar Yadav, who left the house on 17.07.2015 regarding which information was given by this petitioner to Town Police Station, Siwan on 20.07.2015 and the present case has been lodged by the informant on 21.07.2015. Further submission is that while the victim, daughter of the informant, has stated about carrying

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9710 of 2016 (3) dt.03-05-2016

¶6

2/2

¶7

by Vijay Yadav and she has not stated any specific overt act or misbehaviour made by this petitioner, rather she has stated about committing rape by co-accused Vijay Yadav. Further submission is that, in fact, on the pressure of the informant, victim has disclosed the name of the petitioner in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 21.11.2015.

¶8

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Siwan Nagar (T) P.S. Case No. 300 of 2015.

¶9

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶10

manish/-

¶11

U T

Dilip Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Badri Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravin Kumar @ Bhutto Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Rishi Kumar @ Rishikesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjeet Singh @ Ranjeet Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravindra Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar