Allowed

Ravin Kumar @ Bhutto Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC2 May 2016CR. MISC./17693/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to Ravin Kumar @ Bhutto Yadav in PS Case No. 21 of 2015 under Sections 395, 397 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act. Bail was ordered subject to furnishing a bond and two sureties, one being a close relative.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each; one surety must be a parent or close relative.

Ravin Kumar @ Bhutto Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17693 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2015 Thana -KHAGARIA GRP CASE District- KHAGARIA

¶3

====================================================== Ravin Kumar @ Bhutto Yadav, S/o Late Budhan Yadav, resident of Village- Khutiya, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria. Permanent address- at Bihari Marar Tola, Tikarampur, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶4

2 02-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶5

The petitioner is accused in connection with Mansi (Maheshkhut) Rail P.S. Case No. 21 of 2015, registered under Section 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. In course of investigation the name of the petitioner came in the confessional statement of co-accused Santosh Yadav, except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner to show his involvement in the present case. Further submission is that, in fact, the petitioner

¶7

is accused in three other cases, as detailed in para-03 of the

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17693 of 2016 (2) dt.02-05-2016

¶9

2/2

¶10

petition, due to that reason the petitioner has also been implicated in this case. The petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2016.

¶11

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Rail Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Mansi (Maheshkhut) Rail P.S. Case No. 21 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the parents/close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner .

¶12

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)

¶13

manish/-

¶14

U T

Ravin Kumar @ Bhutto Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravin Kumar @ Bhutto Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sobhi Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Dharmendra Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Sabita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Badri Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rishi Kumar @ Rishikesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Harendra Chaudhari Vs The State Of Bihar