The High Court refused to review the earlier order denying bail to the petitioner, citing the nature of allegations. It directed the Additional Sessions Judge to conclude the trial within three months.
Bail prayer rejected; trial directed to conclude within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.8821 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -218 Year- 2013 Thana -RUNISAIDPUR District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Bablu Sahani, Son of late Shivjee Sahani, R/o village - Kharhar Gosainpur, P.S. Meenapur, District - Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2 20-04-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by the order dated 30.1.2015 passed by this Court in Cr. Misc. 37853 of 2014. In view of the nature of allegation, I do not find any reason for reviewing the earlier order refusing prayer for bail even though the prosecution has not supported the case. The prayer for bail stands rejected.
The Additional Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi, is directed to conclude the Sessions Trial No. 320 of 2014 arising out of Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 218 of 2013 positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order without granting unnecessary adjournment to any Party
(Anjana Prakash, J)
S.Ali/U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the earlier order refusing bail should be reviewed in light of lack of prosecution support.
Whether the Sessions Trial should be concluded promptly without adjournments.
Bablu Sahani
The State of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
