In a criminal revision, the High Court of Patna dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the rejection of a Section 319 Cr.P.C. petition by the additional sessions judge at Bhojpur, finding no grounds for interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No.835 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- BHOJPUR
=========================================================== 1. Sohrayee Ram Son of Late Basropan Ram Resident of Village-Danwar, P.S.Kachhawan, District-Rohtas.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Tilak Dhari Ram Son of Late Late Moti Ram
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar 1, APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-04-2016
The Petitioner seeks revision of the order dated 12.6.2014 passed by the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge V, Bhojpur, Ara in Sessions Trial No.165 of 2012 arising out of Tarari P.S. case No.1 of 2012, by the he has rejected the petition under Section 319 Cr.P.C. filed by the prosecution.
Having gone through the records of the case, I do not find any reason for interference and hence the application stands dismissed.
Narendra/U T
(Anjana Prakash, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the additional sessions judge's order rejecting the petition under Section 319 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sohrayee Ram
The State of Bihar
Tilak Dhari Ram
Fulkuer Devi
Mantu Ram
Punam Devi
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
