Allowed

Manager Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Dec 2016CR. MISC./49269/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to Manager Kumar in connection with PS Case No. 6 of 2015. The court ruled that since no recovery was made from the petitioner's possession and his name was implicated by other accused persons, he could be released on bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks, subject to conditions regarding sureties and cooperation with the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks, subject to bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and cooperation with investigation.

Manager Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49269 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2015 Thana -PATNA GRP CASE District- PATNA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Manager Kumar, son of Bhagwan Rai, Resident of Bazar Samiti, Didarganj, Police Station- Didarganj, District- Patna.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kr. Singh(App)

¶10

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 19-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶12

This is an application for anticipatory bail for the offences under Section 3 R.P. (U.P.) Act.

¶13

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner rather it has been alleged that he was seen at the place of occurrence and his name transpired by other caucused persons.

¶14

Heard learned APP appearing for the State who could not controvert this fact.

¶15

Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner and his name transpired by other accused persons, let the petitioner, above

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49269 of 2016 (2) dt.19-12-2016

¶17

¶18

named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with RPF Fatuha P.S. Case No. 6 of 2015, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case as and when required by the police.

¶19

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶20

A.I./-

¶21

Manager Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manager Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baleshwar Yadav @ Babloo Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Indrajeet Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ballu Ram @ Babalu Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Guru Prasad Paswan @ Gurudeo Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Digambar Jha Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar