Allowed

Ballu Ram @ Babalu Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC16 Dec 2016CR. MISC./48199/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted conditional anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with an FIR registered for offences under various sections of the IPC, subject to his arrest or surrender within six weeks and furnishing a bail bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks, by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each of like amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magi

Ballu Ram @ Babalu Ram Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.48199 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 2015 Thana -HATHUA District- GOPALGANJ

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ballu Ram @ Babalu Ram, son of Swaminath Ram, resident of VillageBarwa Kaparpura, P.S.- Hathua, District- Gopalganj.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party

¶7

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Nityanand Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Smt. Veena Kumari Jaiswal (APP)

¶8

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 16-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for State.

¶10

The petitioner prays for anticipatory bail in connection with Hathua P.S. case no. 27 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 420, 406, 467, 468 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that the petitioner has been named in the complaint petition on the basis of suspicion. F.I.R. has been lodged but nothing specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner whereas the accused against whom the allegation of taking money has been attributed has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail by the Sessions Judge itself.

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48199 of 2016 (2) dt.16-12-2016

¶13

2/2

¶14

Heard learned A.P.P.

¶15

Having heard both sides and considering that the accused who was alleged to be taken the money has already been enlarged on bail by the Sessions Judge, let the abovenamed petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1^st class, Gopalganj in connection with Hathua P.S. case no. 27 of 2015 subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶16

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶17

rinkee/-

¶18

U T

Ballu Ram @ Babalu Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ballu Ram @ Babalu Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Shesh Patel @ Sheshnath Patel Vs The State Of Bihar

Jitu Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar

Baleshwar Yadav @ Babloo Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Indrajeet Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Hamidan Khatoon @ Hamida Khatoon Vs The State Of Bihar