Allowed

Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Dec 2016CR. MISC./49023/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner in connection with offences under the Bihar Excise Amendment Act. The court ruled that since the recovery was from the driver's vehicle and not the petitioner's possession, the petitioner is entitled to bail upon surrender within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender within six weeks and be released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Ranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49023 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -81 Year- 2016 Thana -CHAKAI District- JAMUI

¶3

====================================================== 1. Ranjan Kumar Son of Late Parmanand Rai, Resident of VillageDharampur, Narepur, P.S.- Bachhawara, District- Begusarai.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 19-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶6

This is an application for anticipatory bail for the offences under Sections 47A and F of Bihar Excise Amendment Act.

¶7

The allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of five bags foreign liquor.

¶8

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather it is alleged that recovery has been made from the Bolero which was being plied by the driver. The petitioner is owner of the Bolero and petitioner has no role in the case.

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49023 of 2016 (2) dt.19-12-2016

¶10

¶11

Heard learned APP appearing for the State who could not controvert this fact.

¶12

Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that there

¶13

is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 81 of 2016, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case as and when required by the police.

¶14

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶15

A.I./-

¶16

Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baleshwar Yadav @ Babloo Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Indrajeet Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ballu Ram @ Babalu Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Manager Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Guru Prasad Paswan @ Gurudeo Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Digambar Jha Vs The State Of Bihar