Grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a robbery case registered under Section 395 IPC, directing him to furnish a bail bond and two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each.
Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.53928 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -124 Year- 2016 Thana -JOGAPATTI DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH)
====================================================== Shesh Patel @ Sheshnath Patel
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
2 15-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jogapatti P.S. Case No. 124 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is identified in the T.I.P.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner had been identified in the T.I.P. for committing robbery but T.I.P. was held after 40 days of the occurrence. It has also been submitted that he had been identified, saying that he was snatching the motorcycle in the F.I.R., whereas there is no allegation of snatching motorcycle and he has remained in custody since 08.06.2016.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53928 of 2016 (2) dt.15-12-2016
2/2
application.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M-II, West Champaran, Bettiah, in Jogappati P.S. Case No. 124 of 2016.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
siddharth/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail while challanging his identification in T.I.P. and absence of snatch offence allegations in F.I.R.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shesh Patel @ Sheshnath Patel
The State of Bihar
VINOD KUMAR SINHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
