Allowed

Naveen Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC22 Nov 2016CR. MISC./39050/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition arising from a murder case under Section 302 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act, the High Court granted bail to the petitioner. He was named only in a co-accused's confessional statement with no specific allegation of assault or incriminating evidence recovered. The order directed release on bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Directing the petitioner to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Naveen Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39050 of 2016

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -330 Year- 2016 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA

¶4

====================================================== Naveen Yadav S/o Shatrughan Yadav, resident of Village- Sirrahi, P.S.Sour- Bazar, District- Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶5

3 22-11-2016 Heard both sides.

¶6

The petitioner seeks bail in Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 330/2016 registered under Section 302 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶7

The informant alleged that her husband slept after taking food. On the request of her daughter, the informant went to see the fair. When the informant and her three daughters returned, they did not find Shyam Sundar Tanti in the house. The informant asked her daughter to ring her father but he did not take up the call. During the course of search along with Chhotu, it was found that her husband was shot dead. The informant suspected that Ranjit Yadav might have killed her husband on account of previous enmity.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Name of the petitioner figured

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39050 of 2016 (3) dt.22-11-2016

¶10

2/2

¶11

in the case in the confessional statement of co-accused Bhavesh Tanti and Vijay Kumar Yadav but no specific allegation of assault is made against the petitioner.

¶12

Learned A.P.P. stated that Garib Das also saw Vikash Yadav, Amit Yadav and others but did not name the petitioner.

¶13

It appears that the name of the petitioner figured in the case in the confessional statement of co-accused Bhavesh Tanti but no specific allegation of assault is made against the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

¶14

Considering the fact that save and except the name of the petitioner figured in the confessional statement of a coaccused, that too, without any specific allegation and no other incriminating material has been collected showing involvement of the petitioner in the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 330 of 2016.

¶15

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶16

Dilip/-

¶17

U T

Naveen Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naveen Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar Kumar @ Shankar Sonar Vs The State Of Bihar

Anand Prakash Verma Vs The State Of Bihar

Deepak Tanti @ Deepak Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Brij Mohan Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar

Rabindra Rai @ Nagendra Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjan Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar