Allowed

Brij Mohan Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC22 Nov 2016CR. MISC./38600/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to the petitioner in a prosecution case for murder and chance of murder, noting that while he did not shoot the deceased, he is alleged to have injured another victim with a blunt object. The petitioner has been in custody for over five months while co-accused were granted anticipatory bail.

What did the court decide?

Enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Brij Mohan Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38600 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -183 Year- 2016 Thana -SIWAN MUFFASIL District- SIWAN

¶3

====================================================== Brij Mohan Pandey Son of Late Balmiki Pandey Resident of Bindusar Hamid, P.S. Siwan (M), District- Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 4 22-11-2016 Heard both sides.

¶4

The petitioner seeks bail in Siwan (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 183/2016 registered under Section 302 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Informant Ali Ahmad alleged that on 15.05.2016 after election of Mukhiya was over, while the informant along with Sabir and Md. Hasnain was going to meet the villagers, the accused persons waylaid them near the Darwaza of Vidya Singh. Om Prakash Pandey, Brij Mohan Pandey (the petitioner), Jawahar Yadav, Shankar Yadav, Amod Yadav, Lalan Chaudhary having been armed with different arms came there and Jawahar Yadav and Amod Yadav caught Md. Hasnain and Om Prakash Pandey fired on Md. Hasnain. Md. Hasnain fell down on the ground after having been injured. Brij Mohan Pandey assaulted Sabir Hussain

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38600 of 2016 (4) dt.22-11-2016

¶6

2/3

¶7

with Farsa on his head. The other accused persons are also alleged to have assaulted Md. Hasnain. Jawahar Chaudhary is alleged to have assaulted the informant with Farsa.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not the assailant of the deceased Md. Hasnain. The petitioner is alleged to have assaulted Sabir Hussain with Farsa. Sabir Hussain got one lacerated wound 2” x ½” on right mid parietal region and vertex. Opinion with regard to the injury was reserved till X-ray report. The doctor stated that the injury was caused by hard and blunt object. Jawahar Yadav, Amod Yadav and Lalan Chaudhary have already been granted anticipatory bail by different benches of this Court.

¶9

Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.P.P. vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that there is specific allegation that the petitioner assaulted Sabir Hussain with Farsa on his head. One lacerated wound was found on the head of Sabir Hussain but nature of the injury has not come as yet and X-ray was advised.

¶10

It appears that the petitioner has not assaulted Md. Hasnain, who is said to have been shot dead by Om Prakash Pandey. The petitioner is the assailant of Sabir Hussain. Sabir Hussain got one lacerated wound on his head and the opinion of

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38600 of 2016 (4) dt.22-11-2016

¶12

3/3

¶13

injury was kept reserved till X-ray report. For that the petitioner is in jail since 15.06.2016. The petitioner has already remained in jail for more than five months.

¶14

Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in Siwan (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 183 of 2016.

¶15

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶16

Dilip/-

¶17

U T

Brij Mohan Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brij Mohan Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar Kumar @ Shankar Sonar Vs The State Of Bihar

Anand Prakash Verma Vs The State Of Bihar

Deepak Tanti @ Deepak Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Rabindra Rai @ Nagendra Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjan Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Naveen Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar